Scientists Suggest Neptune and Uranus May Not Be the 'Ice Giants' We Thought
A University of California research team is challenging the long-held classification of Neptune and Uranus as 'ice giants,' proposing instead that the two planets may be more accurately described as 'magma-ocean giants.' Because they remain the least-explored planets in the solar system, fundamental questions about their formation locations and internal structures are still unanswered.
Highlights
- A University of California research team proposes reclassifying Neptune and Uranus as 'magma-ocean giants' rather than 'ice giants,' based on the hypothesis that their interiors contain large magma oceans.
- Neptune and Uranus are the least-explored planets in the solar system; NASA's Voyager missions conducted only brief flybys and no dedicated orbiter has ever studied either planet in depth.
- Scientists currently cannot confirm where Neptune and Uranus formed in the early solar system, nor the true composition of their internal structures.
- If the magma-ocean hypothesis is confirmed, it would overturn established planetary classification frameworks and alter the interpretation of similar exoplanets.
- The international astronomy community is actively pursuing a dedicated Uranus orbiter mission as a top scientific priority for the coming decades.
Neptune and Uranus May Not Be 'Ice Giants' After All, Scientists Argue
For decades, Neptune and Uranus have been classified as the solar system's 'ice giants,' but a research team from the University of California is now challenging that designation, suggesting the two planets might be better described as 'magma-ocean giants.'
What Voyager Confirmed — and What It Didn't
Although NASA's Voyager flyby missions provided initial confirmation of the ice-giant classification, science outlet Gizmodo notes that Neptune and Uranus remain the least thoroughly explored planets in the solar system, having never been subjected to in-depth, systematic scientific investigation.
As a result, scientists are still unable to determine:
- Where exactly the two planets formed in the early solar system
- The true composition of their internal structures
- The underlying causes of their distinctive physical characteristics
What the 'Magma-Ocean' Hypothesis Implies
The new hypothesis proposes that the interiors of both planets may harbor vast magma oceans, rather than the water-ice-dominated interiors traditionally assumed. If the hypothesis is substantiated, it would represent a significant disruption to planetary science's classification framework and could also reshape our understanding of similar planets discovered beyond the solar system.
The international astronomy community is currently pushing actively for a dedicated Uranus orbiter mission, hoping to resolve these mysteries within the coming decades.
Original reporting: Slashdot, Gizmodo
原文來源： 查看原文
FAQ
Newsletter
Subscribe to our Low-Altitude Industry Newsletter
Daily curated news on low-altitude economy and drone industry, delivered to your inbox.
Reviewed and published by the LAETimes editorial desk ·
