PAPA 法案會直接廢除 DJI 的專利嗎？

No. The bill would not invalidate DJI's patents or strip ownership. It would make those patents unenforceable within the United States, meaning DJI could not sue U.S. companies for infringement or claim damages through U.S. courts, but would still legally own the patents.

This bill — what stage is it at, and how likely is it to pass?

As of now, the Prohibiting Adversarial Patents Act of 2026 is still at the proposal stage. It must clear committee review and pass votes in both the House and Senate before becoming law. Its ultimate passage remains uncertain, and the industry is watching closely.

Proposed U.S. Patent Bill Could Have Major…

Q: How would this bill affect U.S. drone manufacturers?

If enacted, U.S. drone makers could develop and use technologies similar to those patented by targeted foreign companies — such as DJI's flight control, image stabilization, and obstacle avoidance systems — without facing patent infringement lawsuits in the United States, potentially accelerating domestic drone industry development.

Proposed U.S. Patent Bill Could Have Major Implications for Drone Industry IP Rights

A new bill introduced in the U.S. Congress — the Prohibiting Adversarial Patents Act (PAPA) of 2026 — seeks to render patents held by certain foreign technology companies unenforceable within the United States, without stripping ownership. Sponsored by Rep. Scott Fitzgerald (R-WI), the legislation could significantly curtail the patent rights of Chinese drone makers such as DJI, extending U.S. scrutiny of foreign tech firms into the realm of intellectual property.

23 days ago

Highlights

The Prohibiting Adversarial Patents Act (PAPA) of 2026, introduced by Rep. Scott Fitzgerald (R-WI), would render patents held by designated foreign tech companies unenforceable in the U.S. without revoking ownership.

DJI, already listed on the U.S. Commerce Department Entity List and the DoD's 'Chinese military company' roster, holds extensive patents in flight control, image stabilization, and obstacle avoidance that could be affected.

If passed, U.S. drone manufacturers would be shielded from patent infringement claims by targeted foreign firms, potentially accelerating domestic technology development.

The bill represents a new front in U.S. policy toward foreign tech companies, extending restrictions beyond trade controls and export limits into intellectual property law.

PAPA is still at the proposal stage and must pass committee review and floor votes in both chambers of Congress before it can become law.

A newly introduced bill in the U.S. Congress could extend American oversight of certain foreign technology companies into an entirely new arena: intellectual property rights.

Key Provisions of the Prohibiting Adversarial Patents Act

The Prohibiting Adversarial Patents Act of 2026 (PAPA) was introduced by Rep. Scott Fitzgerald (R-WI) and has attracted co-sponsors from multiple members of Congress.

The bill's central mechanism is notable for its precision: it would render patents held by targeted foreign technology companies unenforceable within the United States — without actually nullifying ownership. In other words, affected companies would retain legal title to their patents, but would be stripped of the ability to bring infringement suits or seek damages through the U.S. legal system.

Potential Impact on the Drone Industry

If enacted, the bill's consequences for the drone industry could be substantial. DJI, which has long dominated the global consumer and commercial drone market, holds an extensive portfolio of patents covering core technologies including flight control systems, image stabilization, and obstacle avoidance.

Should those patents be deemed unenforceable in the United States, American drone manufacturers and related businesses could freely develop and deploy similar technologies without fear of patent litigation from the affected foreign entities. Proponents argue this would accelerate the development of a domestically independent U.S. drone industry.

However, the move could also trigger international trade disputes and undermine the existing framework of global intellectual property protections.

Legislative Context: Escalating U.S. Scrutiny of Foreign Tech Firms

U.S. government scrutiny of certain foreign technology companies has intensified in recent years. DJI has already been placed on the U.S. Department of Commerce's Entity List and designated by the Department of Defense as a "Chinese military company." The introduction of PAPA signals that the United States is now exploring intellectual property policy as an additional lever — beyond trade controls and export restrictions — to limit the market influence of these firms.

The bill remains at the proposal stage and must still pass through committee review and floor votes in both chambers of Congress before it could become law. Industry stakeholders and legal experts are closely monitoring developments, and the issue is expected to generate sustained debate across the drone sector and the broader technology industry.

Originally reported by DRONELIFE; compiled and translated for this publication.

原文來源： 查看原文

Proposed U.S. Patent Bill Could Have Major Implications for Drone Industry IP Rights

Highlights

Key Provisions of the Prohibiting Adversarial Patents Act

Potential Impact on the Drone Industry

Legislative Context: Escalating U.S. Scrutiny of Foreign Tech Firms

FAQ

Subscribe to our Low-Altitude Industry Newsletter

Canadian Drone Maker AVSS Surpasses 2,000 Units This Fiscal Year, Exceeding Last Year's Full-Year Output

Drone Injures Child at Nebraska's Largest Fireworks Show; Remote ID Technology Helps Identify Operator

U.S. Army Tests Autonomous Large-Scale Mine-Laying System